<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s the worst thing you&#8217;ve read lately?</title>
	<link>http://bigbigquestion.com/2008/03/14/whats-the-worst-thing-youve-read-lately/</link>
	<description>Question As Conversation</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tube</title>
		<link>http://bigbigquestion.com/2008/03/14/whats-the-worst-thing-youve-read-lately/#comment-1555</link>
		<dc:creator>Tube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 04:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bigbigquestion.com/2008/03/14/whats-the-worst-thing-youve-read-lately/#comment-1555</guid>
		<description>YouTube comments.

A blight on the ineffable beauty of the "Tube" meme...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YouTube comments.</p>
<p>A blight on the ineffable beauty of the &#8220;Tube&#8221; meme&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: solotoro</title>
		<link>http://bigbigquestion.com/2008/03/14/whats-the-worst-thing-youve-read-lately/#comment-1543</link>
		<dc:creator>solotoro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bigbigquestion.com/2008/03/14/whats-the-worst-thing-youve-read-lately/#comment-1543</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Star Wars&lt;/em&gt;. Not a Star Wars novel, mind you, But &lt;em&gt;Star Wars: From the Adventures of Luke Skywalker&lt;/em&gt;, by George Lucas (actually ghost-written by Alan Dean Foster, according to Wikipedia), © 1976. The writing is fantastically bad:

    &lt;blockquote&gt;The burnished conference table was as soulless and unyielding as the mood of the eight Imperial Senators and officers ranged around it. Imperial troopers stood guard at the entrance to the chamber, which was sparse and coldly lit from lights in the table and walls. One of the youngest of the eight was declaiming. He exhibited the attitude of one who had climbed far and fast by methods best not examined too closely. General Tagge did possess a certain twisted genius, but it was only partly that ability which had lifted him to his present exalted position. Other noisome talents had proven equally efficacious.&lt;/blockquote&gt;I thought of &lt;em&gt;Atlanta Nights&lt;/em&gt; several times while reading it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Star Wars</em>. Not a Star Wars novel, mind you, But <em>Star Wars: From the Adventures of Luke Skywalker</em>, by George Lucas (actually ghost-written by Alan Dean Foster, according to Wikipedia), © 1976. The writing is fantastically bad:</p>
<blockquote><p>The burnished conference table was as soulless and unyielding as the mood of the eight Imperial Senators and officers ranged around it. Imperial troopers stood guard at the entrance to the chamber, which was sparse and coldly lit from lights in the table and walls. One of the youngest of the eight was declaiming. He exhibited the attitude of one who had climbed far and fast by methods best not examined too closely. General Tagge did possess a certain twisted genius, but it was only partly that ability which had lifted him to his present exalted position. Other noisome talents had proven equally efficacious.</p></blockquote>
<p>I thought of <em>Atlanta Nights</em> several times while reading it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: starman</title>
		<link>http://bigbigquestion.com/2008/03/14/whats-the-worst-thing-youve-read-lately/#comment-1542</link>
		<dc:creator>starman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bigbigquestion.com/2008/03/14/whats-the-worst-thing-youve-read-lately/#comment-1542</guid>
		<description>I'm sorry, I know Executioner's Song is supposed to be a masterpiece, but it gets so bogged down in detail.  The story doesn't have to move along at Da Vinci Code pace, but please, the first 100 pages could have been condensed to about five.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, I know Executioner&#8217;s Song is supposed to be a masterpiece, but it gets so bogged down in detail.  The story doesn&#8217;t have to move along at Da Vinci Code pace, but please, the first 100 pages could have been condensed to about five.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marie Mon Dieu</title>
		<link>http://bigbigquestion.com/2008/03/14/whats-the-worst-thing-youve-read-lately/#comment-1538</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie Mon Dieu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bigbigquestion.com/2008/03/14/whats-the-worst-thing-youve-read-lately/#comment-1538</guid>
		<description>Had to be &lt;i&gt;Keeper of the Heart&lt;/i&gt;, by Johanna Lindsey. I like to read fluffy romance novels to take my mind off things, but I like really good fluffy romance novels. This one was a sequel to one I'd read (and groaned about) previously.

I don't really pay much attention when I'm grabbing books off the paperback rack at the library. I mix it up with non-fiction stuff and more erudite reading from the hardcover shelves. Sometimes I win the book lottery, sometimes I lose.

More power to Ms. Lindsey, she's a bestselling author, but it wasn't my cup of tea. Right now I'm reading &lt;i&gt;Flash House&lt;/i&gt; by Aimee Liu, which is a lot more interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had to be <i>Keeper of the Heart</i>, by Johanna Lindsey. I like to read fluffy romance novels to take my mind off things, but I like really good fluffy romance novels. This one was a sequel to one I&#8217;d read (and groaned about) previously.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really pay much attention when I&#8217;m grabbing books off the paperback rack at the library. I mix it up with non-fiction stuff and more erudite reading from the hardcover shelves. Sometimes I win the book lottery, sometimes I lose.</p>
<p>More power to Ms. Lindsey, she&#8217;s a bestselling author, but it wasn&#8217;t my cup of tea. Right now I&#8217;m reading <i>Flash House</i> by Aimee Liu, which is a lot more interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmd82</title>
		<link>http://bigbigquestion.com/2008/03/14/whats-the-worst-thing-youve-read-lately/#comment-1537</link>
		<dc:creator>jmd82</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bigbigquestion.com/2008/03/14/whats-the-worst-thing-youve-read-lately/#comment-1537</guid>
		<description>I took a Business Ethics class last quarter, and the entire text book was a giant, "ZOMG, IF YOU DO ANYTHING UNETHICAL, YOUR COMPANY WILL SPONTANEOUSLY COMBUST AND YOU WILL BE HUNG AND QUARTERED."  I'm all for ethical business classes, and that includes classes about the subject, but I disagreed with most of the text books and found a lot of their arguments incredibly flawed, particularly when you all have to do is look around at best buy, wal-mart, Microsoftm etc, and their unethical practices are well documented and yet they succeed.  If anything, I'd argue that a lot of times its using unethical practices that allow a business to get ahead (speaking for a purely financial standpoint).
Granted, their are companies that do implode from unethical practices, but those seem to be more for straight-up financial illegalities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took a Business Ethics class last quarter, and the entire text book was a giant, &#8220;ZOMG, IF YOU DO ANYTHING UNETHICAL, YOUR COMPANY WILL SPONTANEOUSLY COMBUST AND YOU WILL BE HUNG AND QUARTERED.&#8221;  I&#8217;m all for ethical business classes, and that includes classes about the subject, but I disagreed with most of the text books and found a lot of their arguments incredibly flawed, particularly when you all have to do is look around at best buy, wal-mart, Microsoftm etc, and their unethical practices are well documented and yet they succeed.  If anything, I&#8217;d argue that a lot of times its using unethical practices that allow a business to get ahead (speaking for a purely financial standpoint).<br />
Granted, their are companies that do implode from unethical practices, but those seem to be more for straight-up financial illegalities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phire</title>
		<link>http://bigbigquestion.com/2008/03/14/whats-the-worst-thing-youve-read-lately/#comment-1536</link>
		<dc:creator>Phire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bigbigquestion.com/2008/03/14/whats-the-worst-thing-youve-read-lately/#comment-1536</guid>
		<description>"Politics: An Introduction" by Kenneth Minogue. 

I absolutely detested reading it, and 100-odd pages took me an entire freaking week to get through. 

1. He was absolutely in love with his own prose and delights in not only using obscure words that often barely make sense in context, but also makes some of the most awful syntax choices I've ever run across - and this includes all the High School papers I proofread. Is probably more concerned with getting a 23 on the MS Word readability checker thing than actually, y'know, communicating his points. 

2. This is probably not ENTIRELY his fault, but because he jumps across so many topics, he stays on each topic for all of a paragraph before flitting off somewhere else and then coming back to it four chapters later. There is absolutely no methodology to the way things are organized - he doesn't necessarily do History-development-present, but rather "have an example from history, this is why it's NOT politics, let's jump forward 2000 years now only to go back another 1500 years a few pages later!" ... And then at one point in time he spent three chapters waxing poetic about the SAME metaphor regarding freedom. So those are the chapters I did my essay on, because I couldn't... yeah. no. 

Ummm. I also really couldn't get into "Bloodletting and Miraculous Cures" by Vincent Lam, but it obviously won a huge award so it must have some redeeming features. The first few chapters were good, but I don't think Mr. Lam is necessarily cut out for writing the 'slice-of-life-of-med-student'. The later chapters reminded me a lot of Grey's Anatomy, which is NEVER good in a novel. 

But yeah, other than that it's been a good run of reading. If I had more time to read maybe I'd have more to complain about. 

(Also, never read Tathea. What starts out as a promising adventure novel with assassination, intrigue, and an awesome female protagonist who actually takes care of herself turns into a blatant and unashamed proselytizing novel, complete with "leading to the holy land" and "reclaiming what was promised to us" and AUGH. ... I read it five or six years ago and I still get annoyed thinking about it. I hate it when you mislead people. And I mean, I've read all of Left Behind at the behest of a religious friend, and Tathea was so much worse in terms of the "CONVERT NAOH YEAH!" themes, and hat's saying something. Don't remember who it's by, don't really care.)

Sorry for the length. TLDR etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Politics: An Introduction&#8221; by Kenneth Minogue. </p>
<p>I absolutely detested reading it, and 100-odd pages took me an entire freaking week to get through. </p>
<p>1. He was absolutely in love with his own prose and delights in not only using obscure words that often barely make sense in context, but also makes some of the most awful syntax choices I&#8217;ve ever run across - and this includes all the High School papers I proofread. Is probably more concerned with getting a 23 on the MS Word readability checker thing than actually, y&#8217;know, communicating his points. </p>
<p>2. This is probably not ENTIRELY his fault, but because he jumps across so many topics, he stays on each topic for all of a paragraph before flitting off somewhere else and then coming back to it four chapters later. There is absolutely no methodology to the way things are organized - he doesn&#8217;t necessarily do History-development-present, but rather &#8220;have an example from history, this is why it&#8217;s NOT politics, let&#8217;s jump forward 2000 years now only to go back another 1500 years a few pages later!&#8221; &#8230; And then at one point in time he spent three chapters waxing poetic about the SAME metaphor regarding freedom. So those are the chapters I did my essay on, because I couldn&#8217;t&#8230; yeah. no. </p>
<p>Ummm. I also really couldn&#8217;t get into &#8220;Bloodletting and Miraculous Cures&#8221; by Vincent Lam, but it obviously won a huge award so it must have some redeeming features. The first few chapters were good, but I don&#8217;t think Mr. Lam is necessarily cut out for writing the &#8217;slice-of-life-of-med-student&#8217;. The later chapters reminded me a lot of Grey&#8217;s Anatomy, which is NEVER good in a novel. </p>
<p>But yeah, other than that it&#8217;s been a good run of reading. If I had more time to read maybe I&#8217;d have more to complain about. </p>
<p>(Also, never read Tathea. What starts out as a promising adventure novel with assassination, intrigue, and an awesome female protagonist who actually takes care of herself turns into a blatant and unashamed proselytizing novel, complete with &#8220;leading to the holy land&#8221; and &#8220;reclaiming what was promised to us&#8221; and AUGH. &#8230; I read it five or six years ago and I still get annoyed thinking about it. I hate it when you mislead people. And I mean, I&#8217;ve read all of Left Behind at the behest of a religious friend, and Tathea was so much worse in terms of the &#8220;CONVERT NAOH YEAH!&#8221; themes, and hat&#8217;s saying something. Don&#8217;t remember who it&#8217;s by, don&#8217;t really care.)</p>
<p>Sorry for the length. TLDR etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
